Logo

Can machine learning and AI make programmers obsolete? Can AI make software coding and debugging a thing of the past?

Last Updated: 28.06.2025 16:08

Can machine learning and AI make programmers obsolete? Can AI make software coding and debugging a thing of the past?

To the reader/asker:

And presto goes Claude, the clueless junior-dev (it also botched correctly showing //):

And hey Claude? There’s a reserved float division /. if both numbers are floats, for sure (19) but so can one use // even though both are integers (20):

Chevy’s C8 Corvette ZR1 Supercar Is Even Faster Than It Expected - Robb Report

Ah. Claude Claude Claude.

Claude boy, how do I do division and modulus in OCaml?

Re——-aaaaalllllly.

Skulls once subject to racist study in Germany are laid to rest in New Orleans - NPR

Your software developer job is safe for at least the next 100 years.

And ever so dutifully, Claude reports:

You can do modulus with %. In fact, it’s the standard way to do it! (See command 17). And mod is deprecated (command 18):

Why doesn't speeding significantly decrease one’s commute time? I've done a lot of road trips and driving and have experimented by increasing speed by 10–20%, but somehow this never equates to arriving 20% sooner, even on clear roads.

Let’s use the agent to see if it can search at least, when it doesn’t know?

Let’s ask Claude Sonnet 3.5, which is quite the advanced model (at par with Deepseek V3 R1 and GPT 4o) a very simple question:

Now, let’s think about that for a second or two. Such an elementary matter and such egregious error of omission!

When will the new normal in the global economy return, following the panic caused by US President Donald Trump's tariff flip-flops?

Here’s the proof :

I don’t think so Claudeboy.

Agent, are you sure???? You’re lying again, aren’t you?

How do I become a Buddhist, and can someone explain Buddhism to me?

As usual, I’ll make my point backed by verifiable examples.

And let’s use the latest, extra-capable model 4.1 from OpenAPI. The result: